« All Articles & Film

Impact Study 2025: Drew Allar

Published: May 26, 2025
By: SEC StatCat
Article
Impact Study 2025: Drew Allar

DREW ALLAR

Ahh summertime: A lovely time in our college football schedule driven by hot-taking, list-making and sidewalk baking. Affectionally known as Talking Season, this is also when blowhards and engagement farmers tend to dictate the conversations, with not much else is going on in the sports world. And as most can attest, everyone loves a good quarterback debate.

Fresh off wrapping up my annual QB Impact Study, where I chart the top 40-50 returning passers against their most challenging opponents, this analyst is ready to join the fray and guide you towards a more fulfilling discussion. I ground through tape to find traits that translate and metrics that matter — far more illuminating than citing counting stats or scanning box scores. Plus, this exercise has a great track record for singling out the nation’s top signal callers.

This piece will focus on Penn State's Drew Allar, a traditionally-built passer.


(FOR MOBILE: TILT DEVICE SIDEWAYS FOR BETTER TABLE VIEWABILITY) 

Image

IMPACT SLATE: Ohio State, Washington, Minnesota, Oregon, SMU, Boise State, and Notre Dame. 


The Skinny

Big, tall prototype pocket passer with sneaky, albeit lumbering movement skills. Strong arm, compact release, and limits negative plays well. Not overly vertical. Tends to take profits short avoiding risk. Inconsistent footwork hurts top-end ball placement but still dependable. 

The Fat

Drew Allar’s size, sturdiness, and strong arm make him a clear first-round candidate. He might not be the flashiest athlete, but he has traits that translate. He can see over the frontline, absorb contact, scan the second and third levels, and rifle chances all over the yard. 

Allar’s heavy hammer, out-up release is capable of firing lasers at a millisecond’s notice without any support movement. A couple of his sample attempts crossed the almighty 50-yard-threshold. As a rotational thrower, his body’s natural inertia allows him to whip passes with plenty of zeal from a variety of angles even when not stepping thru on release. In addition to that and being tall, attempts are rarely disrupted by defenders. Typically tucking in his off arm against his body, he’s able to operate neatly without flailing limbs mucking up his upper mechanics in tight confines, which often can doom longer QBs from being consistent placers of the football. Overall, he protects the football fairly well and posted a solid Interceptable Pass Rate.

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

INTA%

Adj Comp%

OVERALL

185

6.9

6.4

8.8

44.9%

33.5%

9.7%

5.9%

71.6%

Impact AVR

181

7.6

7.04

9.88

45.7%

34.7%

10.3%

7.4%

74.4%

D. Allar

Acc%

Depth Adj Acc%

*UNC%

Drop%

Pressure

Sack

Screen+RPO

Play Action

Outside Pocket

OVERALL

63.8%

50.5%

16.2%

11.4%

29.7%

6.5%

10.3%

20.5%

10.3%

Impact AVR

59.1%

46.4%

20.0%

8.7%

25.4%

7.0%

19.0%

20.5%

16.5%

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

Allar’s might helped him stand out when attacking tight windows. Against his hardest foes (that was one of the most challenging in the Impact Study), almost a quarter of his targets were contested. Yet, all of his ball placement metrics beat the impact average, and his Success Rate cracked the crop’s top5. 

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

Contested

44

4.9

2.1

14.3

31.8%

29.6%

6.8%

D. Allar

INTA%

Adj Comp%

Acc%

Depth Adj Acc%

UNC%

Drop%

Makeup%

Contested

25.0%

44.1%

43.2%

37.6%

20.5%

22.7%

23.8%

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

But despite his power potential and a number of darts on tape, Allar overly prefers to throw with finesse. Perhaps a side effect of who he was throwing the football to, soft tosses and touch passes riddled his sample. He can layer passes over the middle with competence and know when to cut off a route vertically with “stop placement” away from coverage.

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

Favoring underneath, he wasn’t shy to compile completions towards the flat. He certainly had an affinity for boundary-side combos where he could promptly get the ball out to space. And as a result, he didn’t dial up many dingers. Play action helped receivers come open and goad Allar to exhibit more verticality. But without that tactic, he was overly conservative. Heck, roughly 14% of his sample yards came targeting a checkdown. Only five of his Impact peers had a lower Deep Pass Rate than his 8.7% figure – A shame considering his tremendous year-over-year improvement placing passes beyond 20 yards downfield. 

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

INTA%

Dropback

145

6.8

6.4

10.5

42.1%

32.4%

9.7%

6.9%

Impact AVR

129.7

8.1

7.4

12.45

46.5%

36.8%

11.7%

8.6%

D. Allar

Adj Comp%

Acc%

DAA%

UNC%

Drop%

Dropback PRE

Sack


Dropback

66.7%

58.6%

50.1%

24.1%

11.7%

33.8%

5.5%


Impact AVR

70.0%

55.1%

46.0%

22.1%

9.3%

28.5%

7.8%


(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

D. Allar

20+ Comp%

20+ Acc%

20+ Unc%

20+ INTA

11-20 Comp

11-20 Acc%

11-20 Unc%

11-20 INTA%

Downfield

31.3%

43.8%

31.3%

37.5%

44.9%

44.9%

32.7%

6.1%

Impact AVR

36.4%

31.3%

35.8%

17.4%

53.6%

49.7%

24.8%

11.5%

D. Allar

10+ ADOT

10+ Comp%

10+ Acc%

10+ UNC%

10+ INTA%

10+ DAA%

10+ Adj Comp

10+ ATT

Downfield

19.9

41.5%

44.6%

32.3%

13.9%

44.0%

48.2%

65

Impact AVR

20.9

47.1%

42.7%

28.8%

13.9%

40.2%

54.3%

63.9

He just appears to be much more comfortable working horizontal looks compared to vertical ones. Despite ideal stature, he doesn’t always clock open men behind coverage, anticipate future wins, or have bountiful examples of leading men outside the numbers. Subsequently, Allar’s spray failed to generate a desirable amount of explosive completions; especially without play action.

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

Play Action

24

10.3

12.8

17.4

50.0%

50.0%

20.8%

Impact AVR

29.3

10.4

10.1

15.2

50.3%

42.3%

19.0%

D. Allar

INTA%

Adj Comp%

Acc%

DAA%

UNC%

Drop%

Sack

Play Action

0.0%

65.0%

50.0%

46.3%

33.3%

4.2%

0.0%

Impact AVR

7.3%

70.4%

54.2%

46.5%

24.0%

8.2%

7.8%

 While that happenstance can be frustrating, Allar’s biggest flaw might be his upper body hubris. Not in the sense of being reckless with his placement and believing he can make every single throw. Again, his Interceptable Pass Rate was among the top-dozen in the Impact Study. But rather, he doesn’t always value throwing from a firm foundation due to his natural arm talent. Allar’s lower body is routinely a mess. Wonky bases were particularly visible in the postseason. But, throws at all levels were affected across his sample by lazy footwork. 

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

D. Allar

Makeup

Y/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

Outside Pocket

10.3%

4.6

6.6

36.8%

21.1%

5.3%

Impact AVR

16.5%

5.98

10.5

38.8%

31.8%

6.9%

D. Allar

INTA%

Adj Comp%

Acc%

DAA%

UNC%

Drop%

Outside Pocket

5.3%

66.7%

42.1%

30.6%

36.8%

10.5%

Impact AVR

6.9%

68.4%

47.9%

43.9%

33.1%

8.2%

Pressure naturally exacerbated this shortcoming. All his placement stats finished in the red in this context for the second-straight Impact Study. QBs that cannot deal with duress rarely workout at the next level. And, this might ruin him as a prospect before the season can even begin. 

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

INTA%

All Pressured

49

4.5

3.3

10.8

27.3%

18.2%

9.1%

9.1%

Impact AVR

44.4

5.96

4.02

13.3

31.1%

26.5%

9.8%

10.7%

D. Allar

Adj Comp%

Acc%

DAA%

UNC%

Drop%

DB PRE%

DB Sack%

DB PRE:Sack%

All Pressured

47.6%

36.4%

28.5%

47.3%

7.3%

33.8%

5.5%

16.3%

Impact AVR

57.6%

37.7%

35.4%

38.8%

7.8%

28.6%

8.5%

28.1%

(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

But while his pressured passing performance has been poopy, Allar still avoids negative plays quite well. Even if he still prematurely drops his eyes against certain pressures, the big fella is undeniably a terror to takedown individually. He might invite late hurries a tad much floating outside the pocket waiting for designs to develop. Still, Allar regularly sheds arm tackles and is underrated navigating a crowd. His 16.3% Dropback Pressure:Sack Ratio was top10 worthy and he finished on the good side of the group average in INTA%. But while he’s an okay play extender, his deliberate moving style and unsound feet hardly make him much of a threat outside of structure or when defenses key on him. 

Statistically, Allar isn’t too sexy. After all, he failed to top 230 yards or a 7.0 Yards/Attempt across Penn State’s final five games. We’ve mentioned some examples already; but his passing profile is a mixed bag through-and-through even if butterfingers hurt his bottomline. Strong arm but conservative approach. Clean upper body but sloppy feet. Fine accuracy but too many throws get away from him. Practically for every laudable metric, a “yea but” retort isn’t too far behind. 

D. Allar

ATT

Y/A

ANY/A

ADOT

Success%

1D+TD%

EXP%

Pass “Floor"

78

6.9

6.3

8.7

46.2%

34.6%

6.4%

Impact AVR

68

8.35

8.15

10.9

50.4%

38.4%

10.9%

D. Allar

INTA%

Adj Comp%

Acc%

DAA%

UNC%

Drop %


Pass “Floor"

7.7%

75.4%

70.5%

61.7%

26.7%

16.7%


Impact AVR

8.5%

74.9%

62.3%

50.6%

14.2%

10.4%


(STATS COLOR CODED BASED ON PERCENTILE AMONG 44 QBS IN 2025 IMPACT STUDY; TILT TABLE SIDEWAYS ON MOBILE)

Even isolating snaps in sound environments prove to be dodgy. On clean dropbacks inside the pocket without guises, Allar had a high Accuracy% ying but also a high Uncatchable% yang. Which do you put more weight in: The degree of perfectly placed passes or the bountiful biffs inside of structure? For some, the noise around his numbers will require too much mental gymnastics. Still, 6’5, 240 lb passers don’t grow on trees. And his physical tools will create plenty of believers in his upside despite a rocky resume. 

Bad Take Brooks Sees a

Ben Roethlisberger type

GLOSSARY

Season